USPTO serial 77921117
COFFEE CHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COFFEE CHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Norval, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart E. Benson
STUART E BENSON MANELLI SELTER PLLC2000 M STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | baked products, namely, cookies, cakes, pastries, biscuits, muffins; bakery products, namely, cake mixes, muffin mixes, cookie mixes; milk based desserts, namely, ice cream, ice cream cones, sundaes, ice cream cakes, ice cream on a stick, ice cream bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |