USPTO serial 77921194
BISCUIT THE LITTLE YELLOW PUPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2013
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BISCUIT THE LITTLE YELLOW PUPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa Lee
Teresa Lee PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 Times SquareNEW YORK, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and playthings, namely, plush toys and accessories therefor, soft sculpture plush toys, soft sculpture toys, stuffed toys, stuffed toy animals | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schories, Pat
- Other trademarks owned by Schories, Pat
- Other trademarks owned by Capucilli, Alyssa S.
- Other trademarks owned by Capucilli, Alyssa S.
- Other trademarks owned by Schories, Pat
- Other trademarks owned by Capucilli, Alyssa S.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BISCUIT THE LITTLE YELLOW PUPPY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 9, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 9, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |