Drawing for ECLIPSE

USPTO serial 77921983

ECLIPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECLIPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS SUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Backpacks adapted for holding computers, camera cases, decorative wind socks for indicating wind direction and intensity, eyeglasses and eyeglass cases, laptop carrying cases, slot machines, sunglasses and sunglass cases, computer storage devices, namely, flash drives; covers for cell phones, portable and handheld electronic digital devices for playing music, namely, MP3 and MP4 players, laptop computers, personal digital assistants, namely, PDAs, and gaming devices, namely, gaming machines, all relating to motion pictures and entertainmentACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 11, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Nov 8, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Aug 10, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Aug 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Aug 1, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATEDโ€”
Apr 11, 2016EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PARTโ€”
Jan 4, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILESโ€”
Dec 7, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILEDโ€”
Dec 4, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETEDโ€”
Oct 13, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Jun 15, 2015RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILEDโ€”
Jun 15, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETEDโ€”
May 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
May 8, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
May 4, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETEDโ€”
Apr 29, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Apr 29, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTEDโ€”
Apr 8, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Mar 27, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTABโ€”
Mar 26, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Mar 25, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 25, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 22, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Aug 21, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 16, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Feb 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTIONโ€”
Jul 25, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Feb 10, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 10, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 24, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Jul 24, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Jul 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jan 13, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jan 6, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Jun 17, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDEDโ€”
Dec 14, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILEDโ€”
Dec 14, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTENโ€”
Nov 23, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Nov 9, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 4, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTEREDโ€”
Mar 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Feb 6, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance