USPTO serial 77921986
ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS SUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Brass wrist cuff bracelets, clocks, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes, jewelry, jewelry boxes, jewelry boxes of metal, lapel pins, medals, rings, rubber bracelets, silver wrist cuff bracelets, sun dials, watch bands, watch bracelets, and watches, all marketed in connection with motion pictures featuring vampires, werewolves, other supernatural creatures and romance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |