USPTO serial 77921992
ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed linen, bath linen, blankets, namely, bed blankets, baby blankets, children's blankets, blanket throws, blankets for outdoor use, and traveling blankets, cloth banners, decorative wall hangings of textile, kitchen linen, shower curtains, and table linens, all relating to motion pictures and entertainment concerning motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 6, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |