USPTO serial 77922934
Serial No. 77922934
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77922934?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alhambra, CA
Alhambra, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Supnik
PAUL D. SUPNIK LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D. SUPNIK9401 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1250BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2945UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and toiletries, namely, cologne, cologne spray, after-shave lotion, after-shaving balms, shaving cream, soap, deodorant for personal use, shampoo, conditioner, styling gels, body lotion, body gel, fragrances for personal use, deodorants and antiperspirants, body creams, shower gels, skin cleansing cream, and skin and body lotions for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |