USPTO serial 77926127
NANOWIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOWIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Abby Barraclough
J. ABBY BARRACLOUGH THORPE NORTH AND WESTERN, LLP.PO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical components for the separation of the polarization properties of light, namely, polarizing beam splitters; beam splitters; polarizers; wave plates; reflective polarizers; polarization-based light recycling systems comprised of beam splitters, polarizers, wave plates, mirrors; polarization-based color separation systems comprised of beam splitter, polarizers, wave plates, mirrors, and reflective polarizers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 17, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |