USPTO serial 77926987
DIGILINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGILINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SMARTLINK NETWORK SYSTEMS LTD.
Verna, Goa 403722, IN
SMARTLINK NETWORK SYSTEMS LTD.
Verna, Goa 403722, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES PLLC412 MAIN STREET7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002-1897Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer network adapters, switches, routers and hubs; telecommunication apparatus and parts thereof, namely, telecommunication cables, telephone connectors, metal cabinets specially adapted to protect telecommunications equipment in the nature of fiber optic cables, electronic test and measurement devices for use in the fields of networks and telecommunications, namely, instrumentation used to test and certify new and existing data and voice communication cable and coaxial cable; modems; VOIP phones; telecommunications equipment, namely, fiber-optic transceivers, fiber optic repeaters; wireless products, namely, wireless computer peripherals; information technology products, namely, cable connectors; cable jump leads; cables and fibers for the transmission of sounds and images; cable for optical signal transmission; coaxial cables; component video cables; computer cables; connection cables; ethernet cables; extension cables; fiber optic cables; optical cables; optical fiber cables; optical fibers sold as a component of fiber optical cables; threaded cable connectors; cable connectors; round plug connectors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |