Drawing for MULTI-RADIO

USPTO serial 77927376

MULTI-RADIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTI-RADIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alain Villeneuve

ALAIN VILLENEUVE VEDDER PRICE PC222 N LASALLE ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042technical consultation about the selection and use of wireless electronic testing equipment of others provided in conjunction with the sale and use of said equipmentACTIVEFeb 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance