USPTO serial 77928717
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Carrillo
MICHAEL G KELBER NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREETSUITE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60602-4000| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |