USPTO serial 77931117
MEIJER INSITE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEIJER INSITE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. VerHuelen
Robert J. VerHuelen Meijer, Inc.2929 Walker Ave., NWLegal Dept.Grand Rapids, MI 49544Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail grocery store services; retail department store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, namely, groceries, general consumer merchandise, soft drinks and bottled waters, dairy products, liquor, wine, bakery goods, delicatessen foods, meat, seafood, bulk foods, electronic products and accessories, automotive and vehicle parts and accessories, pets and pet supplies, furniture, footwear, clothing, baby care products, cosmetics, luggage, hand tools, lawn and garden accessories, toys and playthings, lighting, golfing equipment, sporting goods, school supplies and stationery, seasonal and holiday products, hardware, home repair supplies, gasoline, oil, plumbing and electrical supplies, books and magazines, music, small home and office appliances, optical goods, tobacco and jewelry; retail pharmacy services | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |