Drawing for PELVIC HEALTH PATHWAYS

USPTO serial 77932188

PELVIC HEALTH PATHWAYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PELVIC HEALTH PATHWAYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean Ploen

SEAN PLOEN PLOEN LAW FIRM, PC100 S 5TH ST STE 1900MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical consulting services; medical diagnostic services, namely, urological and urodynamic testing, interpretation, and evaluation; providing medical information, consultation and assistance to physicians, surgeons, clinics and other medical practices in connection with the performance of pelvic floor rehabilitation services, bladder installation services, cystoscopy services, hysteroscopy services, sacral nerve modulation treatments, endometrial ablations, and the placement and monitoring of permanent birth control devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 2, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 3, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 3, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
May 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance