Drawing for BUILDINGBLOKS

USPTO serial 77933014

BUILDINGBLOKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BUILDINGBLOKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin S. Costanza

KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 5TH AVESTE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104-7064

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Modular, gypsum-based, non-metal, non-wood wall sections for permanent installation as non-moveable decorative, non-structural, interior walls and partitions in existing buildingsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 15, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 4, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance