USPTO serial 77935049
PHILIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHILIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, BC, CA
Richmond, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells, PA92 E. Main streetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetable-based meat substitutes; fruit chips; vegetable chips; sausages; hot dogs; luncheon meats; corned beef; corned beef hash; cured beef; jerky; stews; liver paste; pork rind; ham; meat loaf | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |