Drawing for GRIDONOMICS

USPTO serial 77937097

GRIDONOMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIDONOMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer network design for others; computer consultation services; consulting services in the fields of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency; consulting services provided to local governments in the field of development of electrical services and renewable energy resources; consulting in the field of the design and development of smart grid technologyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Nov 4, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Nov 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 29, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 6, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 9, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 9, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 16, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 10, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 9, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 31, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 31, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 3, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 3, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance