Drawing for LAS VEGAS RISING

USPTO serial 77938549

LAS VEGAS RISING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAS VEGAS RISING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur S. Rose

Arthur S. Rose Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of basketball games and conducting basketball exhibitions rendered live in stadiums and through the media of radio and television broadcastsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 29, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 8, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 7, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2010CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance