USPTO serial 77939268
GREEN LANTERN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN LANTERN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet A. Kobrin
JANET A. KOBRIN WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.4000 WARNER BLVDBRIDGE BLDG 156 NORTH, #5074BURBANK, CA 91522-0002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed and dried vegetables; processed and dried fruits, processed ginseng for use as a vegetable; raisins, fruit salads, fruit jellies, marmalade; preserved onions, preserved olives; crystallized fruits; vegetable juices for cooking; processed fruits in the nature of fruit juices for cooking; jams, chocolate nut butter, cocoa butter for food purposes, and peanut butter; canned fruits and vegetables; pickles; soybean-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; frozen fruits and vegetables; potato chips; processed and dried meat; meat; milk; seafood; and margarine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 2, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |