USPTO serial 77947067
THE FARROW SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 2013
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with THE FARROW SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Axenfeld
Robert R. Axenfeld AXENFELD LAW GROUP, LLCP.O. Box 3308West Chester, PA 19381United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; sand paper and sand cloth ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 14, 2009 |
| 007 | machines, namely, cleaning machines for removing surface layers from boats, masonry, including removal of white lines from roads, graffiti and paint from masonry surfaces; abrasive blast cleaning machines and sand blasting machines; machine tools, namely, blast hoses, extension hoses, blast nozzles, nozzle holder hoses, handle assemblies; electric motors and engines, except for land vehicles for machines; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; compressor cleaning machines utilizing pressurized liquids; washing equipment, namely, wet blasting equipment, machinery for stripping grime and paint and machinery for cleaning surfaces using pressurized water and equipment for stripping and cleaning surfaces, namely, wet blasting equipment; sand blasting machinery and equipment, namely, wet blasting equipment; machinery for stripping and cleaning surfaces utilizing [ heat and ] water and equipment for stripping and cleaning surfaces utilizing [ heat and ] water, namely, wet blasting equipment; parts, fittings and components thereof for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Farrow Holdings Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Farrow Holdings Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Farrow Holdings Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named THE FARROW SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 2, 2023 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |