Drawing for FEELING GOOD

USPTO serial 77948444

FEELING GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEELING GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin P. Hoffman

Martin P. Hoffman Stein McEwen, LLP1400 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 300Washington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021hair brushesACTIVEJun 30, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 21, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 20, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 21, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 21, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance