Drawing for VALHALLA GAME STUDIOS

USPTO serial 77948895

VALHALLA GAME STUDIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VALHALLA GAME STUDIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin Gelfand, Esq.

MARVIN GELFAND WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN10250 CONSTELLATION BOULEVARDSUITE 2900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs; Computer game software; Computer software, namely, game engine software for video game development and operation; Video game softwareABANDONED—
016Series of computer game hint books and strategy guides; printed materials, namely, novels and series of fiction books, comic books and short stories featuring scenes and characters based on video gamesABANDONED—
028Positionable toy figures; Toy action figuresABANDONED—
042Design and development of computer game software and virtual reality softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 22, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 22, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 13, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance