USPTO serial 77949736
NO VIBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO VIBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Salem, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim Clise
TIM CLISE CLISE, BILLION & CYR605 HIGHWAY 169 N STE 300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55441-6454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective headgear, namely, helmets, football helmets, softball helmets, baseball helments, lacrosse helments, and bicycle helmets; Hunting and shooting equipment, namely, hunting safety vests, guns, rifles, shotguns, stocks, archery bow strings, and bows | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Bicycle equipment, namely, bicycle seats and bicycle seat covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting and athletic goods, namely, hunting equipment, namely, hunting clothing, hunting vests, hunting gloves, firearms; archery equipment, namley, bows and bow strings; baseball equipment, namely, leg guards, masks, body protectors and umpire body protectors; softball equipment, namely, masks, leg guards and body protectors; football equipment, namely, shoulder pads, arm pads, injury protective pads, thigh guards, knee pads, elbow pads, knee braces, hip pads, blocking pads and shin guards; hockey equipment, namely, shoulder pads, hip pads, body protectors, leg guards and gloves; basketball equipment, namely, knee pads; soccer equipment, namely, leg guards and injury protective pads; lacrosse equipment, namely, shoulder pads, arm pads, injury protective pads, gloves, thigh guards, knee pads, elbow pads, hip pads, blocking pads and shin guards; cycling equipment, namely, body protective pads and gloves; exercise equipment and apparatus used for physical, gym and sports exercises, namely, treadmills, stair-steppers, rowers, elliptical machines and exercise bikes; padding for use on walls athletic venues; athletic equipment inserts, namely, inserts including gel; and protective body armor for sporting and athletic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |