USPTO serial 77952083
SENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dwayne K. Goetzel
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEL, P.C.PO BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transport, distribution, storage and supply of energy, renewable energy, electricity, gas, fuel and oil; transmission of electricity; storage, distribution and supply of solar, wind, biomass, hydroelectric, combustion, tidal and wave energy; transport of offshore wind energy installations; supply of energy sourced from combined-heat-power installations for industrial or domestic use; supply of electricity from micro combined-heat-power installations; consultancy, advisory and information services for all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |