Drawing for ARMORLACE

USPTO serial 77952217

ARMORLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARMORLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Otto Zsigmond

OTTO ZSIGMOND NEXUS LAW GROUP LLP701 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 1500VANCOUVER, V7Y1C6

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026(Based on Intent to Use) Laces for footwear(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Laces for footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 15, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 15, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance