USPTO serial 77953193
IP INSIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IP INSIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER GREENBERG PC1600 JFK BOULEVARD2ND FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring information in the field of law; Newsletters in the field of law | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |