USPTO serial 77956473
ULTRASONIC LAVAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRASONIC LAVAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quickborn, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER KASPER AND LAUGHLIN13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL AND VETERINARY INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUSSES, namely, MICRO SUCTION PENS, SCISSORS, HOOKS, ULTRASOUND TUMOR DISINTEGRATORS FOR SURGICAL PURPOSES, DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUSSES, COMPRESSORS, SYRINGES, HEART MONITORS, OXYGEN MONITORS, ENDOBRACHIAL TUBES, ENDOTRACHEAL TUBES, WOUND DRAINAGE AND SUCTION APPARATUSSES, DENTAL ARTICULATORS, PICKS, BURRS, MIRRORS, HANDPIECES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS, ARTIFICIAL EYES, ARTIFICIAL TEETH; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, BRACES FOR LIMBS AND JOINTS, BONE AND ORTHOPEDIC JOINT IMPLANTS COMPOSED OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS, BELTS, SUPPORT BANDAGES, FOOTWEAR; SURGICAL ARTICLES, namely, THREADS, NEEDLES, ARTIFICIAL SKIN FOR SURGICAL PURPOSES, STAPLERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL AND VETERINARY SERVICES; HEALTH AND BEAUTY CARE SERVICES FOR HUMANS AND ANIMALS; AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, NAIVELY, COMPOST SPREADING; HORTICULTURAL SERVICES, PEST CONTROL SERVICES FOR AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE OR FORESTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |