USPTO serial 77956672
WHIRLWIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHIRLWIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Macclesfield, Cheshire, GB
Macclesfield, Cheshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Billie Jean Smith
BILLIE JEAN SMITH MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeolus Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Aeolus Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named WHIRLWIND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |