USPTO serial 77957351
EXCELLENCE IN MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2011
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EXCELLENCE IN MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie N. Nafziger
Jamie N. Nafziger DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Components of Electromechanical Actuators, Namely, Stepper Motors not for Land Vehicles, Servo Drives for Motors for Use in Industrial Automation Machinery; Electronic Integrated Servo Motors for Use in Industrial Automation Machinery; Electronic Servo and Stepper Motors, and Electric Drives for Use in Industrial Automation Machinery | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1992 |
| 009 | Components of Electromechanical Actuators, Namely, Electronically Operated Rod Screw Cylinders, Electric Screw and Belt Driven Rodless Actuators, Integrated Drive/Motor/Actuator Products and Integrated Motor/Actuator Products, Namely, Electric Actuators that Incorporate Internal Motor and/or Drive Technology into the Actuator, and Electric Controls for Use in Industrial Automation Machinery | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tolomatic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tolomatic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tolomatic, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EXCELLENCE IN MOTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |