Drawing for THE NEUROTIC PARENT

USPTO serial 77959718

THE NEUROTIC PARENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NEUROTIC PARENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

SCOTT J. MAJOR MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD FL 14ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, books on the subjects of colleges and college admissionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 23, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 23, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance