USPTO serial 77960494
TWISTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWISTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Longmeadow, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Giarratana, Esq.
MARK D GIARRATANA MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP185 ASYLUM STREETHARTFORD, CT 06103-3408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | optical fibers for medical and surgical procedures, namely, laser vaporization of prostate tissue for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, excluding surgical devices that facilitate the identification, separation or ablation of biologic tissues | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |