USPTO serial 77961131
INSIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Golden Shelters Private Limited
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta L. Christensen
ROBERTA L. CHRISTENSEN KOLEY JESSEN P.C., L.L.O.1 PACIFIC PL STE 8001125 S 103RD STOMAHA, NE 68124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Religious books; religious circular letters; printed matter, namely, books, newsletters, and magazines in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; brochures about self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; printed reports about self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; catalogues in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; paper; cardboard; boxes of paper or cardboard, placards of paper or cardboard; news bulletins; photographs, office requisites, namely, pens, pencils, staplers, paper hole punchers, adhesive tape and adhesive tape dispensers, rubber bands and stationery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |