USPTO serial 77961315
DYNAMIC INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMIC INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Corcoran, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Corcoran, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C. LITMAN LITMAN LAW OFFICES, LTD.PO BOX 41200ARLINGTON, VA 22204-8200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; Computer software for the databasing, visualization, manipulation, virtual reality immersion and integration of geographic information with on-line member communities; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Electronic apparatus and devices for controlling access to pay-television services; Electronic machines used to apply holographic overlay and to set up and control holograms and verification thereof; Free-space optics transmission systems, Ethernet switches and routers, and software sold both as components thereof and separately, namely, software adapted and arranged for operating, installing, testing, diagnosing and managing the forgoing telecommunication equipment; Interactive multimedia computer game program; Interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware for use with an external monitor and software; Mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data; Telecommunications equipment and software, namely, fiber-optic transceivers, fiber optic repeaters, converters and optimizers, wave division multiplexers, free-space optics transmission systems, switches including Ethernet switches and routers, fiber-to-the-home and ethernet-over-VDSL access aggregators, terminators and repeaters, and remote presence management products, namely, switches, and console, alarm, sensor and power management devices; Telematics apparatus, namely, wireless Internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; Video game interactive remote control units; Wireless communication device featuring voice, data and image transmission including voice, text and picture messaging, a video and still image camera, also functional to purchase music, games, video and software applications over the air for downloading to the device; Wireless computer peripherals; Wireless distribution system comprising waveguides; Wireless telephony apparatus; Wireless television set for providing video conferencing and telephone service over the Internet; Wireless transmitters and receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lark, David L.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Lark, David L.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |