Drawing for SOARING-SING-A-LONGS

USPTO serial 77961406

SOARING-SING-A-LONGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOARING-SING-A-LONGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Lee, Esq.

DAVID C. LEE, ESQ. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1564UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Charitable services, namely, providing a web site featuring entertainment in the nature of non-downloadable music, live and recorded musical performances, songs, videos featuring performances by musicians and children, and interviews with musicians, songwriters, and entertainers all designed for entertainment for children with serious illness and their family and friendsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 4, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 24, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 24, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 18, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance