USPTO serial 77962341
INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS HARMONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS HARMONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq.
SHERRI L. ROHLF, ESQ. SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER, P.A.100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, hair spray, hair styling spray and sculpting gel, hair color and waving lotions; skin care products, namely, body and facial lotions, masks, astringents; cosmetics, namely, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip stick, lip gloss, lip pencils and mascara; body oils and lotions; household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleansers, cleansers for use on dishes, cleaners for use on fabric; cleansers for use on floors, walls, windows and toilets; incense; breath fresheners; fragrances for personal use, perfumes and colognes; and room fragrances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS HARMONIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |