Drawing for RISQUE'

USPTO serial 77962737

RISQUE'

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RISQUE'?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, pants, tops, shorts, headbands, wristband, and hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2011UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Nov 3, 2011UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Oct 21, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2011PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Oct 15, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 10, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 26, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 19, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 19, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance