Drawing for ORIGAMI

USPTO serial 77963081

ORIGAMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIGAMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)

JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Accessories for use with particular personal electronic devices, namely, with portable computing devices, portable digital data storage media and devices, handheld personal electronic devices, namely, digital media player devices, video players, personal digital assistant, handheld wireless devices, cellular handsets, and handheld digital audio and/or video capture devices, said accessories being electronic and non-electronic user interface and interactive devices, namely, user input and output devices, protective cases, carrying cases, holsters, data cables, electrical and non-electrical couplings, electrical and non-electrical adaptors, converters, stands and docking stationsACTIVE—
017Rubber insulating sleeves and/or sheaths for protecting parts of machines; waterproof packings for protecting electronic devices from damage; stuffing composed of rubber or plastic for merchandise packagings; cushioning of rubber or plastic in the nature of stuffing; rubber bags, envelopes, and/or pouches for merchandise packagingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 24, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 23, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 23, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 22, 2011RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Mar 22, 2011RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2011RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jan 6, 2011RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2011RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 23, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance