Drawing for SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX

USPTO serial 77963815

SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Russell

John D. Russell Alleman Hall McCoy Russell & Tuttle LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011light curing systems composed primarily of light emitting diodes for industrial applications; UV curing systems composed primarily of light emitting diodes, for commercial applications, namely, for curing inks, coatings, adhesives, and a variety of other materialsACTIVEMay 10, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 31, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 9, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 9, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance