USPTO serial 77963984
IQ REVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IQ REVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla C. Calcagno
CARLA C. CALCAGNO CALCAGNO LAW2300 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1434UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to collect, host, secure, preserve, analyze, filter, create, store, track, manage, convert, de-duplicate, process, review, cluster, categorize, prioritize and produce databases, images, emails, files and other documents, information, and data and to create reports, in the field of legal and governmental investigations, e-discovery and litigation; computer software for document review and management and the analysis of digital files | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Document management, namely, prioritizing data and information from electronic files and documents and images of hard copy documents, and indexing data and information from such documents for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software used to collect, host, secure, preserve, analyze, filter, create, store, track, manage, convert, de-duplicate, process, review, cluster, categorize, extrapolate, compare, prioritize and produce databases, images, e-mail, files and other documents, information, and data and to create reports in the fields of legal and governmental investigations, e-discovery and litigation, document review, and the analysis of digital files; design of computer software for others in the fields of legal and governmental investigations, e-discovery and litigation, document review and the analysis of digital files; conducting electronic discovery via global computer networks for lawyers, law firms, fiduciaries, corporations and governmental entities and governmental agencies; electronic legal discovery consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consulting services in the fields of legal and governmental investigations, litigation, and document review and the analysis of digital files for legal purposes; legal consulting services in the fields of document, data and file review for legal purposes, and consulting in the field of legal analysis, namely, legal analysis of documents, data and files | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Epiq Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Epiq Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named IQ REVIEW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |