USPTO serial 77965887
PROTEXTUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTEXTUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL NSTE 310NAPLES, FL 34103-3586Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Software for delivering business, personal and/or advertising information and advertisements to users of hand-held computers, mobile computers, personal computers and telephones; advertising software for dissemination of business, personal and/or advertising information and advertisements to users of hand-held computers, mobile computers, personal computers and telephones; computer software used for communicating with others via a global computer network; communication software for connecting users to real time information via a global computer network; downloadable software applications, namely, text messaging software, downloadable software applications for wireless content delivery to provide information and controls in the field of driver and user safety for delivering useful information to a user; downloadable software applications for personal digital assistants (PDAs) and electronic handheld information devices for communicating with others, connecting users to real time information, text messaging, and for wireless content delivery for providing information and controls in the field of driver and user, and other telephonic software for mobile or cellular telephones and devices for communicating with others, connecting users to real time information, text messaging, and for wireless content delivery for providing information and controls in the field of driver and user safety | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising services, namely, promoting the goods or services of others by providing hypertext links to electronic content of others and web sites of others; Dissemination of advertising for others electronically or via the Internet, and dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network on the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer software development services; computer software programming for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |