USPTO serial 77966259
CLEARIFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4035743Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2011
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEARIFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Houston, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Wilentz
THOMAS M. WILENTZ THOMAS M. WILENTZ, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC75 S BROADWAY FL 4WHITE PLAINS, NY 10601-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services consisting of facilitation of planning and execution of business strategies; business administration consultancy; human resources management consultancy; facilitation of delivery of products and services, namely, business advisory services in the field of selling and delivering products and rendering services, facilitation of measurement of business activities and recognition and analysis of trends, namely, business process consulting; and facilitation of compliance with state and federal regulatory agencies, namely, consulting services to assist with preparation of business tax returns | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2010 |
| 036 | Financial consultation, namely, providing cash flow management consultancy services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARIFY, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARIFY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARIFY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCOUNTiGRATE, LP
- Other trademarks owned by ACCOUNTiGRATE, LP
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARIFY, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARIFY, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARIFY, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCOUNTiGRATE, LP
- Other trademarks owned by ACCOUNTiGRATE, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CLEARIFY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 17, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |