USPTO serial 77966532
PRECISION DRIVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRECISION DRIVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. McGinley
Brian R. McGinley Dentons US LLPPO BOX 061080Wacker Drive Station, Willis TowerCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Helicopter transmission and engine parts for aircraft, namely, gears, auxiliary drives, accessory gear box assemblies, rotorcraft drive systems comprised of gears, housings, seals, washers, valves, pumps, filters, labels and coatings, and drive systems composed of gears, housings, seals, washers, valves, pumps, filters, labels and coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Flight critical parts for commercial and military aircraft and non-flight critical parts for commercial aircraft, namely, helicopter gears, brake rotor heads, auxiliary drives, rotorcraft drive systems comprised of gears, housings, seals, washers, valves, pumps, filters, labels and coatings, drive systems composed of gears, housings, seals, washers, valves, pumps, filters, labels and coatings, and structural aircraft parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northstar Aerospace, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Northstar Aerospace, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HELIGEAR ACQUISITION CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named PRECISION DRIVEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |