USPTO serial 77966557
KOI PALACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOI PALACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachelle A. Dubow, Esquire
JOSHUA M DALTON BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP1 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared, frozen, canned and dried meat, poultry, game, seafood, vegetables and fruit; shellfish; frozen or prepared meals in the nature of dim sum consisting primarily of meat, poultry, game, seafood, vegetables and/or fruit; frozen or prepared soup | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Cakes; frozen or prepared meals in the nature of dim sum consisting primarily of pasta, rice, bread, cereals, noodles and/or pastries; tea | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Brothers Associate, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Brothers Associate, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KOI PALACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |