Drawing for PURE WHITE

USPTO serial 77966965

PURE WHITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE WHITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Meyer

CHARLES J MEYER WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT ET AL111 MONUMENT CIRSTE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003AFTER-SUN GELS; AFTER-SUN MILKS; AFTER-SUN OILS; ALOE VERA GEL FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; BATH OILS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; BATH POWDER; CHALK FOR COSMETIC USE; CLEANER FOR COSMETIC BRUSHES; COCOA BUTTER FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; COLOGNES AND PERFUMES; CONCEALERS; COSMETIC BALLS; COSMETIC FACIAL BLOTTING PAPERS; COSMETIC MILKS; COSMETIC OILS; COSMETIC OILS FOR THE EPIDERMIS; COSMETIC OLIVE OILS FOR THE FACE AND BODY; COSMETIC PADS; COSMETIC PENCILS; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS AGAINST SUNBURN; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR EYE LASHES; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR SLIMMING PURPOSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 16, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 2, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 1, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 31, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance