USPTO serial 77967156
ED KSHAKE HOCOLATE, FIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ED KSHAKE HOCOLATE, FIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pound Ridge, NY
Pound Ridge, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Grenier, Esq.
MICHELLE L. GRENIER, ESQ. GRENIER LAW OFFICES, PC225 FRANKLIN ST FL 26BOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute and dietary supplement; meal replacement energy bars; meal replacement nutrition bars; ready-to-eat meal replacement nutritional bars; ready-to-eat meal replacement energy bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Snack bars, namely, soy protein based nutrient dense snack bars; soy based nutrient dense snack bars also containing seeds, fruits, vegetables and nuts; seed-based nutrient dense snack bars; seed-based nutrient dense snack bars also containing soy, fruit, vegetables and nuts; protein based, nutrient dense snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jug O' Nuts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jug O' Nuts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ED KSHAKE HOCOLATE, FIG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |