USPTO serial 77967215
BFFL! BEST FRIEND FOR LIFE !
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BFFL! BEST FRIEND FOR LIFE !?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Cox
WILLIAM H COX GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH & COX LLP355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, shirts, pants, jackets and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |