Drawing for ENTERPRISE IT AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 77967552

ENTERPRISE IT AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ENTERPRISE IT AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent G. LoTempio

VINCENT G. LOTEMPIO KLOSS, STENGER & LOTEMPIO69 DELAWARE AVE RM 1002BUFFALO, NY 14202-3805UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer project management services; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer project management services, namely, management of the hosting of computer hardware, computer operating systems, and computer application infrastructure to optimize the ability of hardware, operating systems, application infrastructure to function and host computer software applications, Websites, databases, and/or digital content of others; server and device administration, backup and recovery, managed storage, monitoring, reporting, security, deployment and scaling, data management, technology planning, delivery management, technical support, application environment optimization and change management, application problem management, application monitoring, and/or application scalability and capacity planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance