Drawing for WORKSMART

USPTO serial 77968626

WORKSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Graif

Michael R. Graif Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP101 Park Avenue35th FloorNew York, NY 10178

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Marking products, namely, ink pads, rubber stamps, date stamps, self-inking ink stamps, pre-inked stamp pads, paper embossers, printed paper signs, paper banners, ink rollers for stamp pads, stencils, stencil machines in the nature of mimeographs, check marking machines for preventing fraud, price markers in the nature of label printing machines, dry-erase marking boards, markers, marking pens, pencils, pens, chalk and industrial marking product, namely, soapstone; labeling products, namely, paper labels, marking tabs, sleeve protectors in the nature of document folders, adhesive labels, office labeling machines, label printing machines, folders, label ribbon tapes; adhesives for stationery, office and household use, laminating machines and laminating pouches for use therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 5, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance