Drawing for BFK·FOCUS

USPTO serial 77969900

BFK·FOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BFK·FOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melanie Martin-Jones

MELANIE MARTIN-JONES PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR, LLP41 S HIGH ST STE 2800COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6194UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in the education field by teachers, schools and school districts to improve instruction by undergoing a process that takes users through levels of analysis to assess student performance results, identify root causes and develop a meaningful action plan at the macro, namely, grade level or micro, namely, individual teacher levelABANDONEDNov 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance