Drawing for NYC.GOV/GREENYC

USPTO serial 77975166

NYC.GOV/GREENYC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NYC.GOV/GREENYC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine Winningham

KATHERINE WINNINGHAM NEW YORK CITY LAW DEPARTMENT100 CHURCH STNEW YORK, NY 10007-2601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Beverage glassware; Thermal insulated containers for food or beverage; Glass beverageware; Dishes and platesACTIVE—
025Sweat shirts; T-shirts; CapsACTIVE—
035Promoting the economic development in the City of New York; Promoting public awareness of policies and practices of the City of New York in the field of environmentally sustainable growthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2008CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2008CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 7, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance