USPTO serial 77975653
THE ENGINEERING SEARCH ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3469953Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2008
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ENGINEERING SEARCH ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne F. Reinke
Wayne F. Reinke HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203-5160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information and referrals regarding the goods and services of others via a global computer network in the nature of product announcements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 2006 |
| 041 | Providing newsletters online in the fields of news, science, engineering, technology, manufacturing, components, instruments, equipment, materials, management, and information technology, namely, acoustics and audio technology, alternative power, building and construction, chemical engineering, coatings and surface engineering, data acquisition, design and analysis software, display technologies, drives, electrical components, electronic components, electronic product design, electronic test equipment, engineering management, engineering student news, environmental technology, fastening, joining and assembly, glass and ceramics, HVAC, hydraulics, industrial automation, industrial computing, industrial MRO (Maintenance, Repair and Operations), industrial processing equipment, international news, lab equipment, light and laser, machine tools and metal working, material handling, mechanical components, medical equipment design, MEMS technology, metal working, metals and alloys, motion control components, motors, nano technology, networking and communications, packaging and labeling, plant engineering, plastics and resins, plastics fabrication, pneumatics, power generation, power transmission, pump technology, quality control, robotics systems, scientific instruments, semiconductor fabrication, sensors and switches, shock, vibration and noise, supply chain management, test and measurement, textile manufacturing and technology, valve technology, wire and cable technology, and wireless technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |