USPTO serial 77975882
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PLANO, TX
CORALVILLE, IA
Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Coralville, IA
Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Coralville, IA
Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Coralville, IA
Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Martin, Esq.
Paul W. Martin, Esq. NCR Corporation3097 Satellite Boulevard, Bldg 700Law DepartmentDuluth, GA 30096| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized on-line ordering services in the field of food in the institutional food industry and restaurant industry; inventory management in the field of food in the institutional food industry and restaurant industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 1995 |
| 039 | Food delivery services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 1995 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for generating customized in-house menus for use in the institutional food industry and restaurant industry; providing temporary use of the on-line non-downloadable computer software for accumulating and analyzing data and generating reports for a dietary management program in the institutional food industry and restaurant industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |